Hospital Compare Data helps consumers make decisions about where to get health care and encourages hospitals to improve the quality of care. Developing collaborative partnerships to leverage knowledge and resources. The Hospital Compare star ratings are based on data hospitals provide to CMS through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program and the Hospital. The US paradox is that Medicare spending, which as of 2019 was 799 billion and costs an average of 80,000 per patient in the last year of life, has far fewer financial limitations when it comes. VA facility data is shown on some quality measures found on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Care Compare website.Using continual, community-based quality improvement resources through the Quality Improvement Organizations.Nursing Home Compare has detailed information about every Medicare. Nursing Home Compare Find and compare the quality of care at over 15,000 Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing homes. Hospital Compare is a tool maintained by the U.S. Physician Compare Get information on physicians and other health care professionals now enrolled in Medicare. This year, these ratings are calculated using a revised methodology finalized in the calendar year 2021 outpatient prospective payment system final rule. Testing rewards for superior performance on certain quality measures. Find and compare the quality of care at over 4,000 Medicare-certified hospitals. 01:19 PM The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today updated the overall hospital quality star ratings at Care Compare.Displaying hospital quality information on Web sites for consumers, including Care Compare and the Provider Data Catalog. The difference between private and Medicare rates was greater for outpatient than inpatient hospital services, which averaged 264 and 189 of Medicare rates overall, respectively.Regulating and enforcing standards set by State survey agenciesand CMS.The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) uses a variety of tools to encourage improvements in the quality of care delivered by hospitals. This encourages consumers to discuss and make more informed decisions on how to obtain the best hospital care, provides incentives for hospitals to improve care, and emphasizes public accountability. The intent of the Hospital Quality Initiative (HQI) is to improve the quality of care that hospitals provide and to distribute clearly defined and objective data about hospital performance. We’ve also improved Medicare’s compare sites. CMS created the Five-Star Quality Rating System to help consumers, their families, and caregivers choose highly rated hospitals and providers in their area. Now available! Our new Provider Data Catalog makes it easier for you to search & download our publicly reported data.
0 Comments
The risks posed by continued operations at the half-century old, increasingly unsafe Indian Point nuclear plant are too well documented to ignore. You can see how near we are to clean, safe, Indian Point-free power, in this one chart, from a recent report commissioned by the New York Independent System Operator, which manages the state’s grid: power plants built in 2021 will be carbon-free, as cheap wind and solar power, coupled with plummeting battery storage prices, take over the market. is “significantly overbuilt” today, and the drive to reduce carbon emissions will make any future investments in new gas generation risky, according to a report published in January by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Driven by the boom in hydrofracking, which New York banned as unsafe in 2014, gas-fired power generation much of the U.S. Beyond these impressive totals, we can count on another 4,300 MW in offshore wind capacity, through the five different offshore wind projects New York State has in active development, as well.Īs shown below, the renewable energy and energy efficiency projects coming on line between 2017, when Indian Point’s closure was announced, and 2025 will provide nearly triple the total amount of power Indian Point once generated.Īs to gas-fired plants currently online: Indian Point’s closure will not save them cheaper renewables, demand reduction and the CLCPA will put them out of business. Thanks in part to the state’s groundbreaking 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), additional clean resources now in operation or under development will contribute another 20,000 GWh annually by 2024, exceeding Indian Point’s annual generation of 16,334 GWh. During this same period, use of natural gas was cut by nearly 9,000 GWh, more than the entire output of Indian Point Reactor 2, which closed in 2020. This includes an increase in annual generation of roughly 430 GWh from utility-scale solar, 970 GWh from small-scale distributed solar, 450 GWh from onshore wind, and about 4,700 GWh in cumulative energy efficiency savings relative to 2016. In fact, annual renewable generation and energy efficiency savings between 20 increased by 6,550 gigawatt hours statewide, more than half the output of Indian Point. Since the agreement to close Indian Point was signed in 2017, New York has taken aggressive action to reduce reliance on this plant and on fossil fuel-generated power, by ramping up on renewables and energy efficiency. The revolution in NY’s energy supply since the 2017 Indian Point Closure agreement Add that to the risk of accident at Indian Point, and it’s clear why the plant needs to shut down. Its once-through water cooling system violates the Clean Water Act and kills over a billion fish, eggs and fish larvae each year, as it withdraws up to 2 billion gallons per day in cooling water from the Hudson, which has contributed for decades to the decline of the Hudson River ecosystem. Indian Point imperils our environment in other ways, as well. The NRC has consistently enabled the operator of Indian Point by looking the other way on safety issues, even permitting the plant to evade federal fire safety standards governing the electrical cables that the plant would rely upon in an emergency. George Pataki concluded that the plant’s evacuation plan would fail to protect the tens of millions who live in the region in an emergency. Then, as if to put an exclamation point on the case for closure, inspection results released just after the 2017 agreement was signed showed that 27% of the bolts which hold together the core of Indian Point Reactor 2, were impaired or missing and a subsequent inspection of Unit 3 revealed 31% of its bolts were also damaged - by far the worst results of any reactors worldwide.Ī 2011 Nuclear Regulatory Commission study rated Indian Point number one for risk of meltdown due to earthquake, and a 2003 study commissioned by then-Gov. In one 12-month period, just before the 2017 closure agreement, Indian Point suffered seven major malfunctions - pump and power failures, a transformer explosion, radiation leaks, a fire and an oil spill. The need to close Indian Point to protect public safety is well documented. And, when you couple how much safer we’ll be without Indian Point with the revolution in renewables and energy efficiency that the plant’s impending shutdown has helped to trigger, you’ll know that closing Indian Point is the only way to assure clean and safe energy for New York. The risks associated with continuing to operate Indian Point should make you more than a little relieved that this increasingly unsafe, half-century old plant will finally close, on April 30, under the landmark 2017 agreement that Riverkeeper concluded with the State of New York and plant owner, Entergy. If you’re in the market for safe, sustainable energy in New York, the Indian Point nuclear plant just isn’t for you. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |